# Source-bound figure and inspection

The controller rendered `model/elements.jsonl`, `model/arrows.jsonl` and `propositions.jsonl` after the account and table were written. Render version: ace42768204b7a42a696a316ca2bf2e9e9c2e11ceb50dde4b1fae5049e5e09c3. Image: out/display/ace42768204b7a42a696a316ca2bf2e9e9c2e11ceb50dde4b1fae5049e5e09c3/model.png. Inspected with the native image tool; table source read at 7960.

The four arrows describe bounded local responses, not estimated causal effects. **The uniform line for `A04` does not encode its thin warrant: it is the thin acceptance-to-release sequence, not equally strong evidence with the other relations.** Two-column paths are local orders; the Grey Blob path has the intermediate accepting process `P04`, not a universal mediator. Disconnected boxes are retained observations/conditions, not silent causes. No complete loop is drawn.

## Every box

- `P01`: Specifying a drawable next task. Range: A proposed object and its ordinary local response, not every choice, order or completed mark.
- `P02`: Undertaking a named local task or reporting a beginning. Range: Acknowledged work or reported start; no inference of durable completion.
- `P03`: Offering room for artwork under reciprocal defense terms. Range: Explicit conditional neighbor offers, not every restraint appeal.
- `P04`: Accepting reciprocal defense work to keep an artwork. Range: Tentative willingness or explicit reciprocal promise, not completed performance.
- `P05`: Requesting revised tools or wider notice after overwritten work. Range: Correction and publicity requests grounded in participants' reports, without certifying their diagnosis.
- `P06`: Releasing an unfinished agreement after placement closes. Range: Explicit release in the read full Grey Blob turn; coded quote alone preserves lament.
- `P07`: Marking and preserving a shared achievement. Range: Thanks, song and preserved accounts, not verified artwork survival or goal unanimity.
- `P08`: Routing helpers to current instructions and specialist channels. Range: Directions to coordination; observed entry or use is not required or inferred.
- `K01`: New pixel work is reported repeatedly overwritten. Range: A reported practical obstacle, not a settled identity of erasers.
- `K02`: Participants want incompatible ends for shared activity. Range: Explicit or enacted opposed desired outcomes, not a collective reversal or all-purpose disagreement.
- `K03`: Further placement on the original platform is unavailable. Range: External closure at hour 73, with uneven awareness; does not end every social or coordinating act.
- `K04`: A needed update or venue is not immediately accessible. Range: Absent updater, practical venue constraint or principled objection; these grounds remain distinct.

## Every drawn arrow and its instance

- `A01` / `N01`: `P01` to `P02`. Label proposal `c0189` gives a responsive helper an object, followed by reported beginning `c0191`, `E-10`. Live refusal elsewhere defeats universality.
- `A02` / `N02`: `P03` to `P04`. Grey Blob terms `c0193` are explicitly accepted in `c0194`, `E-08`. Commitment only, no measured inducement effect.
- `A03` / `N03`: `K01` to `P05`. Obstruction report `c0160` followed by retry `c0161`, tool-change `c0162` and publicity `c0163`, `E-07`. Means reopened, diagnosis and remedy unresolved.
- `A04` / `N04`: `P04` to `P06`. Accepted bargain `c0194`, contact promise `c0195`, release in full final turn `dfsacgn`, `637idk`, `E-08`, as read at 3549 and 6797. `c0196` alone is lament; the account states that limit. Thin, no external failure opportunity established.

Quoted instances are supplied byte-for-byte in account.md and data_structure.md through cites 7610–7684; the complete support arrays remain the source, not these paraphrases. Every drawn arrow has quote support; no forest-transition array is claimed (support_transition is empty throughout). This is one case; no arrow has a community prevalence count. The retained episode support and adverse tests are in arrows.jsonl, not a frequency inferred from how many lines appear.

`K03` explicitly marks external closure at hour 73. No edge is invented from closure to every process. `A05` has no instance and no proposition, so is omitted. The views with and without admissible theorised arrows therefore coincide: none qualifies for drawing; a dashed invented route would be misleading.

## What is absent

The model deliberately leaves `P08` unjoined to uptake, `P07` unjoined to later motivation, and conditions `K02` and `K04` without identified effects. There are no formal-role boxes or dimension-to-dimension arrows. `t18`, `t19`, `t20`, `t21` are contextual rather than higher-theme members, although the deadline condition uses `t19`. Allocation-review authority, post-close uptake, origins and global agreed purpose are unaccounted for. Successful task acceptance crosses the closed topic-based theme tier through `FP-01`; it is not counted as another theme.

The image was legible and faithful to these source decisions. No source correction or new analytical pass is warranted by the drawing. It remains a sparse local process model, not a complete organizational theory.

## Header-only close repair

Initial close check failed table:tiers, not model or evidence. The table header now explicitly names the sibling T4 column in the prescribed six-column order. Current table source was read at8178; no row or quote changed. Re-rendered graph has the same scientific elements and arrows and was inspected natively. The previous render version 105c87276669abf820c171c9c88ab5e80ba5f37f09702c94433a0d46a7565125 is retained historically. Original confidence grades are repeated unchanged after reopening finalization8146.