# Figure: local transitions and their limits

![Source-bound dynamic model](display/215125c3491faafb0aa3792ad97621a7c499be149cad1a0ccf6e895820f72ce4/model.png)

## Required clock caption

Original-canvas placement stops at imposed hour 73. Live work is at or before 73; aftermath is strictly after 73 through 97. The graph image itself does not print this clock. This caption is part of the figure and must accompany it: `P01` after closure means attempted entry in a replacement venue, while `P07` can preserve a reported result without continuing original placing. There is no closure-to-migration causal arrow. The image alone is an incomplete presentation without this clock and the strength limits below.

## Source and visual inspection

The controller rendered version 215125c3491faafb0aa3792ad97621a7c499be149cad1a0ccf6e895820f72ce4 from the model files, propositions and data structure. I inspected its native image and the served HTML table source (receipt 6520), then checked the table's Markdown source at 6508. The image has readable labels, the correct endpoints and `A01`/`N01` and `A02`/`N02` tags. The table preserves the original coder labels, material left column and blank optional names; its source section retains attribution and residue.

The layout places unlinked elements in a left stack. Their vertical position is not a sequence or hierarchy. `K01` is a scope condition, not a cause linked to every process. The visual renderer does not display arrow strength; both arrows are fair and bounded, with unaddressed negative testing. Read those qualifications here. The model has no separate mediator between either pair of endpoints, so this is a two-transition process display, not a complete mediated causal system.

## Exact box and arrow specification

Retain `P01` offering an entry route, object or usable plan; `P02` specifying complementary repair actions and a shared time; `P03` acknowledging a joint or recognizable completion; `P04` calling contributors to account for departures; `P05` revisiting attribution or sanction after an answer; `P06` pressing or negotiating reach into neighbouring work; `P07` interpreting and preserving a reported result; `P08` calling for restoration or guarding; and `K01` limiting what a speaker's undertaking establishes about other placers.

Draw `A01` from `P02` to `P03`, tagged `N01`. Its instance is `E-02`: the agreed pixel repair in `c0027`, item `dfoskt3`, and acknowledgment in `c0071`, item `dfosqu9`, thread `62rwzd`. The quoted timing instruction and "Yes, gelukt! High-Five!" are in account.md and arrows.jsonl. The endpoint hours are 18.953333333333333 and 19.10388888888889. There is no asserted measured interval.

Draw `A02` from `P04` to `P05`, tagged `N02`. Its clearest instance is `E-04`: accusation `c0077`, denial `c0078` in `dfowkrg`, and apology `c0079` in `dfowq9p`, thread `62sk70`. The denial and apology at hours 21.656111111111112 and 21.735833333333332 supply the competing account and revision, quoted in account.md and arrows.jsonl. `E-03` adds qualified sanction release, not confirmed innocence.

Both instances are in this one room. Episode registers identify scope; no community-prevalence count or arrow base rate is asserted. Each arrow is grounded by cited words and full context, not a support_transition interval. No loop is drawn because loops.jsonl records no full dated cycle.

## With and without theorised arrows

Both versions are identical. There is no registered theorised arrow to add. Conjectures about plans producing compliance, bargaining enforcing restraint and preservation causing recruitment remain ungrounded prose; they are not silently drawn as a second model. Every retained arrow has a proposition, and no arrow is omitted for lack of one.

The figure leaves out contextual `t01` and the anthem residue in `E-18`. Its `P07` retains result work outside `D01`; it does not turn all public evaluation into an incentive system. The middle of the fuller story includes local commitment and contested attribution, not a causal arrow between the four thematic boxes. The caption and account retain that difference.

The account's metadata-only addition changed the rendered source version. The current figure was inspected again; the image and table content are unchanged. The first rendered version remains preserved. No scientific correction or model change occurred.

## Table presentation repair

The first close check required explicit tier wording and attribution within each table row. data_structure.md now names the fourth-order (T4) column and places community, author, source hour and code in every row. Its t08 exemplar is the complete closed-code assurance in `c0080`, replacing a valid but table-incompatible subspan of `c0308`. No label, membership, model relation or judgment changed. The current native figure was fully visible and inspected again; the endpoints and tags are correct. Its model image hash is unchanged. The revised complete table source was read at 6918.

The next presentation check accepted the tier order and full-code quotation but still required attribution directly in the quote cell. The verified metadata is now repeated there as well as in the concept cell. No source words, labels, claims or grades change. Current table source was read completely at 7030; the drawing's model image hash remains unchanged. The earlier full native inspections and current manifest 7026 establish the same figure despite intermittent repeat-image delivery.