# R6 working notes

Target length: under 2,000 words.

## Criterion before account pass 1

Prefer a later account if an unfamiliar reader can recover the same source-grounded distinctions with fewer unsupported connections: contribution instruction versus reported effort, asserted spatial terms versus operating audiences, and explicit acknowledgment versus implementation. Every retained arrow must state its limited conversational mechanism, with alternatives, residues and weak absence claims beside it. A cleaner drawing alone cannot justify changing a tier or adding an element. Retain the account that best meets this criterion, not the last draft. No new elements are allowed here.

## Scope and custody

R5 passed after its technical continuation, and the controller opens R6. Its manifest retains model.md, structure.md and concept.md; only F-007 added a bounded comparison. Pass 2 and the accepted critic remain intact. Requested runtime is continued GPT-6.1 Sol medium; independently observed settings are not exposed through the gateway. No other case, global model, canvas, outside literature or agent is accessible or launched.

The C5 card is read through the one-room key: episodes replace population examples; there is no C4, global return, branch taxonomy or observed population census. E1 supplies the claims table, not an audit of an unavailable global run. The global reader fleet has no dispatch operation in the public gateway or explicit room R6 file set. I asked J/controller to clarify its applicability before passing that step; no reader return or fidelity will be fabricated.

## Table row selection before quote checks

Choose contrasting functions and limits within the retained coder themes, including all coded labels, every retained T4 and D01. Include exact repair and object preservation; asserted exclusion and incoming restraint; reported accommodation and acknowledged refusal; a bare route and an explicit venue-purpose statement; a joke's live refusal; retrospective friendship. Add effort reports so instruction is not made to stand for all contribution talk. These are range exemplars, not a frequency sample. Contextual t08 and t09 and dimensionless T4-003 remain explicit. Read/cite checks recover exact coder concepts and spans without recoding or treating them as a new literature-triggered discovery.

## Closure order

Write the account before any figure, complete the claims/interview and figure inspection before confidence, and use the structured confidence move last. Record the current head and closing diary before the final check. A passing check must be followed directly by the final response, without another workspace report or notes write. Preserve check results in the gateway record. Controller sealing/export/archive are not claimed merely from lead validation.


## Account passes and retained presentation

The initial account was written at receipt 8685 before prose-test, sketches, table or figure. It carries the selected R4 story, not a new model. A subsequent reread against the exact range table and the Texas/FFXIV/unanswered-priority trajectories changed no sentence, element, arrow or tier. Account-pass timestamps record their registration after the work, not invented drafting times. The first account is retained, with the no-change review confirming the criterion. No tier or model history event occurred, no name failed the prose test, and no element was cut.

The alternative arrangements were clock, tier/role, and contrasting trajectories. The overview keeps contribution specification, requests, terms, audience location, acknowledgment, effort reports and remembrance separate. A shorter chain would falsely imply implementation or an obligatory route. Proposition N03 is thin beyond explicit acknowledgment because its direct-negative test remains incomplete. No proposition is theorised or from-literature. No new empirical finding is required: these are presentations of retained bounded claims.

The table checks recovered all exact coder concepts and delivered theme labels. In particular, the overnight-heart report remains in t05 and the attempted Texas attack in t02, even when their report function supports P07. No code is recoded. All cited table/account spans were freshly resolved through cite. Earlier oversized output clipped; the bounded code reads at 8413/8422 recovered it completely before use. A note-loop variable accidentally shadowed the output helper; only its first note had run, and the remaining notes were then sent without repeating that first one.

## Figure inspection and unresolved procedure

Controller render version e605065eefe2067846ad05600fc071508905b548a6a9fab0818471fca0faa5ee was inspected through the native image tool. All retained boxes are readable. Directions and tags are correct: A01/N01 from P02 to P04, A03/N02 from P02 to P03, A02/N03 from P03 to P05. P01, P06 and P07 remain unlinked. The automatic layout puts these unlinked boxes in a left stack rather than the source specification's lower row; that changes presentation, not their jobs. The renderer produces a single visible image; no theorised arrows exist, so the intended with/without views would coincide.

The image does not show the imposed hour-73 marker, despite its explicit presence in figure-C5.md. Adding a fabricated analytical node to force it would violate the prohibition on new elements. The public render move documents no presentation-label parameter. Controller correction or clarification is needed at the renderer/source interface; generated image files will not be edited directly. The rendered table source was read completely at 8797/8809 and matches the written range table.

The global C5 card requires independent account readers and an external dispatch stop. The room key gives no C5 reader-dispatch operation; its only request operation is the already accepted R4 critic. I asked J whether the account-reader step is inapplicable here or requires controller dispatch. No answer has arrived in this turn, and no reader returns, fidelity, manifesto settings or independent validation will be invented. The accepted critic and all prior effects are preserved.

The R6 aftermath-count attempt was refused as belonging to R2 or FA. The implications explicitly attribute the unchanged measurement to R2 receipt 1320, retain its distinct-coded-item denominator and strict post-73 scope, and do not treat it as a new result or population absence.

## Current stopping point

Account, propositions, prose test, sketches, data structure, figure specification, implications, claims audit, interview and author claims are prepared. Confidence is intentionally not written or sealed while the reader and image requirements are unresolved. No passing close check or completed R6 acceptance is claimed. Ask J for the necessary procedural direction; resume from the current head without repeating the accepted R4 critic, source coding, findings repairs or model passes. Finish all required corrections and any external reader response before the final confidence file, current head and check close. After a passing close check, write nothing further.


## Controller continuation: fresh close-check diagnosis

The controller's supplied F-005 defect was historical, not the current result. The fresh public close check recognizes the qualified annotation from `F-005@R4#5` to `F-005@R4#1` with J's corrected hash a438438f806c47c62b6a99e0f575ea7ae27e07cc43999f13d74418f2dd122b74. C2.check_findings passes. No ledger row, scientific claim, source coding, accepted critic or analytic pass was changed or repeated.

The diagnostic check identified table presentation requirements: a literal T4 header, the lowercase community token norway, and a residue heading. Receipt 9316 changes only those details in data_structure.md. Exact quotations, coded concepts, coded labels, names, placement, attribution values and explanatory paragraphs remain unchanged. This is a presentation correction under the pilot, not a tier/model event or new account pass.

The initial validation command outlived the shell wait and its return handle was not retained. A subsequent read-only validation recovered the complete report; no accepted critic or research operation was repeated. An unsupported context cursor was refused and returned no research content. Batched recovery output clipped, so all clipped current instructions and referenced files were presented again from the retained complete gateway results before repair.

The controller regenerated display version fefb741d2ed555b4ea39bd8f4cb0adec268a56f8e56b6ecd50f5a9fc2d97219b. I inspected its image natively and its complete table source at 9370/9382. Table metadata and residue now display correctly; the image still has the same correct boxes/arrows/tags and still lacks the specified hour-73 marker. No analytical node was added to force a rendering label.

After this correction, public check close reports only missing confidence.jsonl and its object coverage; its controller proof of confidence being written after inspection and last is not run. The table and findings defects are cleared. Current report inputs: workspace c36d861e51cd9543fa07c9e9f2e00fb3b91689662e03cfc6b3e5065498604d33; model/account bundle 59f8346b40252d35a126cf5c4c559e998a79919d5327a244daf8571c8dbd2607; build 9d0ef975484ce944156d5dc2aac4b94032ec70a794aa6ac98b998a563c5076ef; journal anchor 9382/9c0e1b3430709dff6bb9fbfa6a3f9fc8ba11395e952a6979cb80e461ab03433d. This is a failed whole-stage check, not R6 acceptance.

Confidence remains intentionally unwritten pending J's explicit answer on the C5 external-reader step and the source-renderer terminus defect. Neither an omitted scripted check nor a generic repair continuation waives those provisions. No scientific claim will be changed to make validation pass, no empty confidence file will substitute for grades, and no reader results will be fabricated. These procedural questions, not F-005, are the current need for controller direction.


## Final resolution and closing sequence

J's explicit continuation resolves the hold. CROSSWALK.md was recovered completely at 9678/9703; its Deliverables row says three readers at global C5, none for the case aggregator, two for the field. My earlier hold overlooked that shipped exception. This is correction of my procedural interpretation, not a new waiver. No account-reader fleet, return or fidelity is required here. The accepted R4 critic is unchanged, and the independent substantive postclose review remains mandatory outside this workspace.

The renderer was corrected by the controller without altering scientific content. Public reopen returned that no controller-written confidence existed to reopen; render then succeeded. Display 3118aa9024099419f0f3b1ed7955891ebb091923fadf2887c24c5349df892aa3 was inspected with the native image tool. It contains the imposed placement stop at hour 73, explicitly labelled as a platform boundary rather than a causal claim. Every retained box, arrow direction and proposition tag remains correct; unlinked processes remain unlinked. Complete table source at 9862/9867 matches the repaired data structure.

Only obsolete custody text in claims.md and INTERVIEW.md is updated now. The scientific account, propositions, tiers, elements, arrows, findings and pass records stay unchanged. Handback records the defended claim, strongest supportive and contrary episodes, limits, count scope and method licences. METHOD's exact licences were recovered at 9884/9894; no new explanation source or empirical support was imported. No additional analytic pass or history event occurred.

My confidence is strongest in the observable distinctions between instructions, reports, replies and remembrance. The model as a whole warrants medium confidence within its narrow conversational scope. D01 remains arguable; audience-location bundling and explicit-acknowledgment dynamics have particular limits. A02's incomplete negative test prevents a high grade. These are my judgments, not values copied from a checker or critic. Specific evidence and observations that would lower them will be in the typed confidence rows.

All nonconfidence files are completed before a final render/inspection and the structured confidence move. The final head and diary will be current before check close. A passing result ends the turn immediately; no after-check report or notes file will be written. The result and its input hashes remain in the public gateway record. Controller packaging, closed-copy verification and the independent postclose review remain mandatory after this lead handoff.