# Model figure and its specification

Target length: under 1,600 words.

## Source-bound rendering

The controller rendered version bfd21b5c8c31303ef9896a9657f58cbcdff2d8959c2a080ef1cd205d60c85ae8 from the current model and propositions after account.md and data_structure.md were written. I inspected the generated image through the native image tool and read the table source through the gateway. Its source-bound boxes and proposition tags match the retained model. The drawing below is the generated artifact, not a manually edited image.

![Source-bound model drawing](display/bfd21b5c8c31303ef9896a9657f58cbcdff2d8959c2a080ef1cd205d60c85ae8/model.png)

In this separate preserved-parent presentation revision, the qualified controller rendering includes a disconnected annotation headed External event boundary, containing Hour 73 and Placement disabled. I inspected the actual generated image. The annotation has no connection to any scientific element and establishes no additional process ordering. The earlier caption-only treatment is superseded here; its original departure remains in departures.jsonl with an appended supersession record. No scientific node or arrow was added to repair the layout.

Required terminus: **At hour 73, placement is disabled for everyone.** This imposed setting boundary is not an extra empirical model element or an arrow from the other processes. Public attribution and argument may continue afterward.

## Exact nodes and arrangement

The figure uses all retained elements. No new node or edge is inferred from the layout:

| ID | Box content and scope |
|---|---|
| `P01` | Specifying and correcting the shared image and explaining contribution; intelligibility, without inferred uptake |
| `K01` | Reported human placers outside shared plans; representatives cannot bind everyone named |
| `P02` | Proposing a visible border to guide those humans by example; no proven restraint |
| `P03` | Shared destinations and artifacts for helpers and plans; access and uptake may be unresolved |
| `P04` | Removing event material and redirecting its authors; posting policy, not pixel command |
| `K02` | A helper's reported responsibility for taking the earlier flag; no independently measured emotion |
| `P05` | Reported restoration elsewhere; no universal reconciliation |
| `P06` | Crediting and qualifying achievement; product, helper or collective ability |
| `P07` | Contesting national attribution beyond a current placement arrangement |
| `P08` | Appraising involvement against competing uses of work, attention or room space |
| `P09` | Recruiting, bargaining and pledging responses; includes failure and uncertain uptake |
| `R01` | Moderator posting authority; bound on the routing relation, not an unrecorded causal arrow |
| `P10` | Reporting adaptation of automated patterns; implementation and effect unverified |

In the generated two-column arrangement, `K01`, `P03` and `K02` appear left of their respective responses `P02`, `P04` and `P05`. Other nodes stand separately. `R01` must be read as the recorded condition on `A02`; it has no separately supported arrow. A role-based specification would place it beside that relation. Vertical order in the generated image is not chronology or rank.

This rendering has no distinct middle column and should be read as a sparse set of local links, not a fully connected organizational life cycle. The prose states what each response does and what it fails to establish. Practical coordination reach (`D01`) gathers the arrangement-related elements; collective attribution scope (`D02`) gathers `P06` and `P07`. `P08` is undimensioned. There is no causal arrow between those dimensions.

## Every arrow, proposition and instance

`A01`, `K01` to `P02`, tagged `N01`, is fair and bounded. Its mechanism is the intended example for plan-ignoring humans. The instance is `E-06`; `c0191`, `dfpa4w7`, thread `62ursx`, ZlC8lJC2xd8GeO4rAskLnH5UdNY=, hour 27.291666666666668, says:

> Not the coordinated Dutch, but random people who aren't looking at the plans.
>
> In order to alleviate this issue we are proposing a better border to give the right example to the randoms: http://i.imgur.com/nR8f1Xf.png
>
> But we can't keep up atm, it'll take some time.

`A02`, `P03` to `P04`, tagged `N02`, is fair and bounded by `R01` and adopted policy. Its mechanism is invoking a dedicated destination to justify removal and redirection. The instance is `E-12`; `c0091`, `dfqo6sg`, thread `62zy6h`, by0DENmoA2PajuJgtcIMMjzA6lo=, hour 52.45027777777778, says:

> Το έχω αφαιρέσει (όπως θα αφαιρέσω και όλα τα σχετικά με discord), για να τα βάλουμε στο /r/GreecePlace.

The same moderator's announcement is `c0101`, item and thread `631tan`, hour 51.8825. No same-thread interval is asserted for this cross-thread policy relation.

`A03`, `K02` to `P05`, tagged `N03`, is thin and bounded. The participant explains restorative help as making amends. The instance is `E-08`; `c0065`, `dfqmd7x`, thread `62yogm`, 3Iq3aeu2D+NUGzMK3AoNH6Jkmyg=, hour 51.76861111111111, says:

> We kinda took your flag yesterday and we felt guilty so we helped making it in another spot

Each source quotation was verified through cite in R6 (7213, 7217 and 7215 respectively). These are local instances with episode sampling units, not community-frequency measurements. The single room does not provide an inter-room denominator. Every arrow in the model is carried by a proposition; none is dropped for lacking one. No arrow rests on a computed timed transition. The diagram uses solid lines for all three; the text's strength and participant-account distinctions are necessary to read them.

## With and without theorised arrows

No theorised arrow is drawn. The source-bound rendering with theorised arrows included and the rendering without them are therefore identical. The same generated artifact serves both views; duplicating it would add no information. loops.jsonl records no grounded loop. No visual cycle is added.

## What the figure leaves out

The sparse links do not show restoration integration in `E-08`, effective venue consolidation in `E-12` or changed-pattern execution in `E-15`. It shows neither praise sustaining work nor complaints causing moderation. It does not visually express the full scope debate in `P07`, the range of burden appraisals in `P08`, or every returned repair sequence. The original contextual material is `t02` (rival symbols), `t07` (seasonal drachma play), `t11` (ordinary banter destinations), and the contextual part of `t10` (watching, appreciation, diagnosis and interface inquiry). The register's contrast between national battle appeals, practical requests, parody and moral generalization is retained in form_pass.md and prose rather than converted into additional causal nodes.