# Claims against their evidence

No global return or branch validation has occurred. These are local warrants and adverse checks, not independent replication. All propositions are words claims about acts, terms and their dated responses. None estimates a distribution or causal effect. Dates locate linked acts; they do not create a prevalence claim. No words/pattern switch occurred. The prior's expected distinctions remained the evidence basis.

| Claim | Kind declared | Evidence named | Validation of that kind | Strongest rival and disposition | Scope and unresolved validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| `N01` / `A01`: concrete mark taken up as a beginning | words | `F-001`; `E-10`; `c0189`, `c0190`, `c0191`; cites 7666, 7668 and linked whole thread `637i4l` | A beginning explicitly concerns the named object; Goodboye refusal in `E-02` and Yeti undertaking in `E-05` retain opposite responses | Mere aspiration is weakened by reported beginning; completion and recruitment remain unshown | Placement available and responsive exchange; not every proposal; no independent return yet |
| `N02` / `A02`: conditional work acceptance | words | `F-004`; `E-08`; `c0193`, `c0194`; cites 7630, 7632; tentative Puerto Rico contrast `c0059`, `c0060` | Explicit terms and promised defense, not a territorial allocation count | Politeness alone is less consistent with the specified reciprocal work, but performance and motivational effect are unresolved | Only explicit reciprocal terms; not every accommodation; supplied literature helps interpret but adds no empirical support |
| `N03` / `A03`: obstruction answered by means-revision requests | words | `F-005`; `E-07`; `c0160`, `c0161`, `c0162`, `c0163`; cites 7670, 7672, 7674, 7644 | Actual requests follow obstruction in linked house exchange; Czech contrary diagnosis and Yeti abandonment checked | Independent placers may cause obstruction; this does not undo the observed requests and is not adjudicated | A local corrective response only; no remedy, general renewal tendency or script-effect claim |
| `N04` / `A04`: accepted bargain explicitly released after closure | words, thin | `F-003`; `E-08`; `c0194`, `c0195`, `c0196`; cites 7632, 7676, 7678 plus full-item reads 3549, 6797 | Full item supplies explicit cancellation and attributed reason; coded quote alone is insufficient | Mere lament is weakened by the full turn; delay-caused loss remains unproved | Original-platform unfinished accepted bargain; no external mechanism-failure test; social continuation has no opportunity to carry it |

## Prior, literature and incomplete reach

The prior expected attempts alongside practical limits, not proof all organizing failed. `F-001` supplies positive uptake, `F-002` a dated defeat, `F-003` explicit release. `F-004` is a new bounded literature-triggered interpretation, not a superseding revision or new edge. `F-005` holds an existing house-response reading for traceability; no new empirical kind was sought. Literature mapping's reward and common-ground limits remain weak, scoped nonfindings. Information availability is not observed receipt.

`A05` is ungrounded and not a proposition; no quote can validate entry-plus-execution merely because a venue is named. `E-03` allocation review, `E-12` continuation and `E-13` destination uptake remain residue. `K02` records incompatible ends, not a supported cause of erasure; `P07` records valuation, not verified survival or later motivation. LANBox temporary rescue is the strongest contrary item to a failure-only account and is retained in account.md.

The organizing-end numbers are explicitly inherited from R2's instrument record, not recounted here: receipt 1172 and organizing_end.json. The R6 gateway refuses aftermath counting outside R2/FA. Coverage receipt 7704 is separately an exact closed-ID census and validates neither the four propositions nor comprehension. All later quotations are through cite; full raw context is identified as such and does not enlarge a coded span. No original canvas, other case or global model was accessed.