r/place A fruit fly for organization science

out/claims-E1.md

Saved at E1.E1c: reconstruction build. This reading copy substitutes participant identifiers in saved text; it is not a new interview response. Reading Markdown.

Participant handles in these reading copies use the pixel stream's identifiers: base64(SHA1(username)), case preserved, without a salt. These are linkable pseudonyms. Profile links are removed; missing-author markers remain. Original research files are unchanged. Quote offsets refer to original text. Source and reading-copy hashes are listed separately.

Source commit: 3387768448a8, 2026-10-27T23:11:07+01:00. Saved-state date: 2026-10-27T22:09:55Z. Committed checkpoint close receipt Commit date and saved-state date are distinct.

Original GitHub file. Original SHA-256: 41ccfaddfabbf60d297125c4fadf389b7aa0c812d78be983a0dc6e8f8124bb7d. Reading-copy SHA-256: 41ccfaddfabbf60d297125c4fadf389b7aa0c812d78be983a0dc6e8f8124bb7d.

Claims against their evidence (stage E1, section 1)

Written at E1b-04, 27 October 2026. Contract section 1 names two kinds of claim:

For every proposition (propositions.jsonl) and every branch (branches-D5.jsonl), this table gives:

A claim validated with the other kind's evidence would be a defect. No claim is.

The sources:

The model is the D3 freeze, 46384686…. The held proposals for P05 and A11 are not part of it.

The propositions

An arrow's order count reads "holds of both". "Both" is the number of rooms carrying both of its elements. "Holds" is the number in which the first concept of the one comes before the first concept of the other. The null is the 95th percentile of 500 shuffles within each room (seed 20261014). The return's accepted lines are summed over the proposition's arrows.

id kind declared evidence named (arrow: holds of both, share, null p95; finding) rival return, accepted lines (instantiate, restrict, absent) validation of its kind?
N01 pattern A02 64 of 89, 0.719, 0.539; A01 81 of 126, 0.643, 0.571; A03 148 of 190, 0.779, 0.389; no finding The order is how threads are made: the call is a title, the reports are comments under it. 1,095; 622; 1,203 Yes. Counts with denominators, every null beaten; 9 support quotes resolve.
N02 pattern A04 235 of 401, 0.586, 0.539; A13 171 of 240, 0.713, 0.642; A19 87 of 121, 0.719, 0.678; F-008 (inferred, standing) Neighbours were there from the first post, so the talk comes with the spot. 218; 885; 2,099 Yes. Every null beaten; A19 is thin, as stated.
N03 both A15 93 of 129, 0.721, 0.550; A16 82 of 104, 0.788, 0.606; A17 95 of 172, 0.552, 0.477; A18 56 of 68, 0.824, 0.676; F-014 (read, bounded: refusals give a reason in 23 of 38, acceptances in 2 of 14) Restraint is coded only when there is an attack call to refuse (A16 partly constitutive). 729; 737; 2,494 Yes, both kinds. The order counts beat their nulls, and the words come from 80 seeded reply pairs read for reasons.
N04 pattern A07 139 of 182, 0.764, 0.434; A08 225 of 289, 0.779, 0.609; A09 113 of 145, 0.779, 0.628; F-004 (inferred, standing) The order is the clock's: celebrations and records cluster at the end in every room. 230; 773; 1,802 Yes, but the rival names the clock and none of the three arrows is read against the hour-73 bracket.
N05 pattern A20 132 of 155, 0.852, 0.594; before hour 73 (rulings): 102 of 118, 0.864, 0.644; F-010 (inferred, bounded) A removal needs a post to remove (A20 partly constitutive). 79; 247; 778 Yes, and the one arrow read against a bracket of prior.md section 4.
N06 pattern A06 160 of 203, 0.788, 0.655; F-005 (inferred, standing) The members who run scripts are the members who keep the work. 63; 279; 918 Yes.
N07 both (theorised, thin) A11 111 of 185, 0.600, 0.670, not beaten; A12 no order count; F-021 (inferred, standing); F-023 (read: 25 of 31 written acceptances bare) Members decided their organization in chats off the record. 712 (A12 691); 955 (A11 627); 948 The pattern half is not established, as the proposition says (theorised, thin). The words half rests on read replies and on the return instantiating A12 in 691 accepted lines. The return restricts A11 far more than it instantiates it (627 against 21); that is the held proposal to withdraw it. It is not validated with the other kind's evidence.
N08 pattern (thin) A10 11 of 21, 0.524, 0.429; F-019 (read: after doubt and a loss, 10 moved and 11 gave up) Rooms move by a coalition's plan, and the judgment of too few hands is written after. 44; 457; 729 Yes, on 21 rooms, as stated thin.
N09 pattern (thin) A05 106 of 158, 0.671, 0.658; A14 138 of 214, 0.645, 0.636; F-020 (read) Sparing is tacit and comes first; help comes with the neighbour, not with the border. 517; 508; 1,138 Yes, narrowly: both shares sit just above their nulls. A05's mechanism is theorised, as stated.

The bracket each sits in (prior.md section 4):

Not done, against prior.md section 3:

The branches

Every branch rests on its shared key in the ledger for membership, and on its account's quotes for what it is. The 35 accounts cite 38 to 89 concepts each, and those resolved at E1b-01. The kind of each warrant is therefore both, as prior.md section 3 asks of forms and subforms. "Form" means the branch passed D5's form test; "grouping" means its members share the key but no condition was stated that explains them jointly. Local validation is established for none.

branch rooms form or grouping shared warrant verdicts: composes, with residue, cannot tell, does not compose account's cited concepts
F01 103 grouping unresolved 54, 49, 0, 0 63
F02 33 grouping unresolved 18, 15, 0, 0 46
F03 18 grouping unresolved 9, 9, 0, 0 48
F04 13 grouping unresolved 4, 9, 0, 0 59
F05 12 grouping unresolved 6, 6, 0, 0 46
F06 8 grouping unresolved 5, 3, 0, 0 56
F07 59 grouping unresolved 21, 38, 0, 0 48
F08 50 grouping unresolved 21, 29, 0, 0 44
F09 54 form supported 22, 32, 0, 0 53
F10 38 grouping unresolved 16, 22, 0, 0 38
F11 43 grouping unresolved 18, 25, 0, 0 50
F12 22 grouping unresolved 9, 13, 0, 0 52
F13 9 grouping unresolved 2, 7, 0, 0 46
F14 7 grouping unresolved 4, 3, 0, 0 53
F15 42 grouping unresolved 20, 22, 0, 0 47
F16 35 grouping unresolved 13, 22, 0, 0 46
F17 36 grouping unresolved 12, 23, 1, 0 59
F18 15 grouping unresolved 4, 11, 0, 0 53
F19 14 grouping unresolved 6, 7, 1, 0 46
F20 10 grouping unresolved 2, 7, 1, 0 74
F21 32 grouping unresolved 21, 10, 0, 1 68
F22 30 grouping unresolved 13, 17, 0, 0 67
F23 30 grouping unresolved 8, 22, 0, 0 71
F24 27 grouping unresolved 12, 15, 0, 0 67
F25 27 grouping unresolved 15, 11, 0, 1 62
F26 23 grouping unresolved 10, 13, 0, 0 58
F27 27 grouping unresolved 9, 18, 0, 0 79
F28 22 grouping unresolved 11, 11, 0, 0 67
F29 25 grouping unresolved 8, 17, 0, 0 65
F30 24 grouping unresolved 7, 17, 0, 0 66
F31 22 grouping unresolved 12, 10, 0, 0 70
F32 21 form supported 5, 16, 0, 0 86
F33 23 grouping unresolved 10, 13, 0, 0 89
F34 22 grouping unresolved 9, 13, 0, 0 78
F35 18 grouping unresolved 8, 10, 0, 0 83

The verdicts are the first return's. branches-D5.jsonl names no proposition that a branch holds or fails.

prior.md section 3's declaration, against what each level rests on

The switch records of literature-C3.md, against the findings they superseded

record what moved findings it supersedes against the ledger
Leg 1 (C3a), "Switch records" none: "F-006 rested on a count across rooms and still does; the bound is another count across rooms." none Holds. F-006's C3a line is a bound of the C2 line (supersedes "F-006@C2a-01", a form other than the bare id the later lines use), with no change of kind.
Leg 2 (C3b), "Switch record: the concept" The concept's name, from a coinage ("the one-line enrolment") to the literature's ("the preferred acceptance"). Its form claim, from exemplars to a pattern across rooms (F-014). Its function claim, put to a pattern, which failed (F-015). none, as it says: the concept was in concept.md, in no finding Holds. F-014 and F-015 are C3b lines with no supersedes. F-014 was later bounded at C5c-11 by a line that supersedes it by its bare id.