out/claims.md
Saved at r/blackmirror: 6.1 local model, R6. This reading copy substitutes participant identifiers in saved text; it is not a new interview response. Reading Markdown.
Participant handles in these reading copies use the pixel stream's identifiers: base64(SHA1(username)), case preserved, without a salt. These are linkable pseudonyms. Profile links are removed; missing-author markers remain. Original research files are unchanged. Quote offsets refer to original text. Source and reading-copy hashes are listed separately.
Source commit: c070d990be88, 2026-10-23T12:38:38+02:00. Saved-state date: not recorded. Not recorded in the catalogue; source commit date is not a close date. Commit date and saved-state date are distinct.
Declared saved-state supplement. Member: workspace/out/claims.md. Original SHA-256: ddf55f59139e6170a709363c9295fd6f4625a44d4dbf7dedc38e8ba0303b1e99. Reading-copy SHA-256: 357979d7c1001008a3a1d12aa8ad0e0c244ac6087739b740d8a5c25135169611.
Claims against evidence
Target length: under 1,700 words.
Proposition audit
Each proposition retains its declared kind. Words are checked against cited spans and episode context; dated order uses instrument hours and the independent cutoff. No count is offered as proof of meaning. No frequency, probabilistic effect or cross-case validation is claimed. The R4 critic was answered once. C5 reader comprehension testing did not run under the declared rule10 departure; it is not a passing validation result.
| Proposition | Kind and primary | Evidence | Strongest rival | Validation received and limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
N01 on A01 |
words | "EDIT2: I added a much smaller version of this picture, with its
measurements, underneath the larger image. I think that one will still
be visible, and be far easier to make and maintain."
(c0014, item dfoxud5, thread
62s5if, oHVsyeaY/1c+HArySkXaDsD14gM=, H22.275, cite5742)
"Once we clear a large enough area maybe write r/blackmirror so people
can help with the phone? Until then, I'm not sure how effective 3 folks
will be aside from making small ones." (c0029, item
dfp25cs, thread 62s5if,
K8FrAKwjV0LGh2qPhrmDrMLXHZc=, H24.073055555555555, cite5746) "Yeah that
seems like a good idea, we'd need larger numbers though. We're
struggling to maintain what we have at the moment." (c0051,
item dfq9cbo, thread 62zxr8,
HvV9clLEkhXnU09KzzP8rTOgqQc=, H46.93083333333333, cite5762) |
Smallness is merely aesthetic; the explicit maintenance and helper rationales distinguish the retained feasibility reading. | Exact maintenance/helper reasons distinguish feasibility from aesthetic preference; no causal estimate of implementation or optimal scale. Independent return not performed. |
N02 on A02 |
both, primary words | "I'm willing to help, where is the official logo going to go?"
(c0031, item dfp38tw, thread
62s5if, CUNg/rRwlRuk5rtFj2KQBsvCXhU=, H24.504166666666666,
cite5748) "I think the plan right now is to start out with a group of
logos in this area." (c0032, item dfp3wra,
thread 62s5if, K8FrAKwjV0LGh2qPhrmDrMLXHZc=,
H24.77027777777778, cite5750) |
The answer is a parallel announcement rather than guidance; its direct response and repeated plan support the local answering reading, without proving later contribution. | Direct request and relevant answer support the local exchange. The later unanswered maintenance request defeats any automatic response rule; missing bodies make abandonment weak. No volunteer pixel uptake verified. Independent return not performed. |
N03 on A03 |
words | "Vandals overnight, I PM'd them and they've stopped. Randoms are
still pushing the purple though." (c0052, item
dfq9oq4, thread 62zxr8,
HvV9clLEkhXnU09KzzP8rTOgqQc=, H47.081944444444446, cite5764) |
The vandals stopped independently of the message; the single account cannot distinguish this from contact having an effect. | One participant explicitly attributes cessation to contact, but independent cessation is unresolved. Thin; counterpart messages and dated behavior are needed. Independent return not performed. |
N04 on A04 |
both, primary pattern | "I did that. Got a message "you can place a tile" went to place some
more black and couldn't get on the site. Then seconds later place was
over." (c0057, item dfssjhw, thread
63ahf5, id5388uDDIYiP5TXVudiwsxxk+4=, H82.55194444444444,
cite5774) "Edit- not bragging just found r/place so much fun. The white
bear logo was looking good, then next time I got on half were purple. So
I started working on fixing some. That was late here at night (est).
Woke up, checked it out, everything was gone. Looked like someone was
writing "salami". Tried again making logos around the three black lines
under the salami "I" and kept getting overtaken. Tried that corner it's
in and started moving along and was slapped in my face with "it's over".
Hope r/place comes along again!" (c0058, item
dfssjhw, thread 63ahf5,
id5388uDDIYiP5TXVudiwsxxk+4=, H82.55194444444444, cite5776) "I had a
good time doing it too! :D" (c0061, item
dfsyng9, thread 63ahf5,
K8FrAKwjV0LGh2qPhrmDrMLXHZc=, H85.04555555555555, cite5780) |
Testimony could merely be nostalgic and unrelated to interruption; the independent cutoff establishes order and the participant explicitly recounts losing access, but neither establishes closure causing pleasure. | Independent H73 cutoff precedes H82.55194444444444 and H85.04555555555555 testimony. This is order and reported interruption, not closure causing enjoyment. Referral elsewhere is beyond original-canvas scope. Independent return not performed. |
Other consequential claims
The shared-goal claim rests on P01, the explicit
proposal and acceptance quoted in account.md, not the subreddit label.
It establishes local adoption, not a roster. D01 compares
two dependencies and does not supply a common mechanism for every arrow.
T4-003 supplies retrospective valuation rather than
prospective incentive evidence. F-004 is a
literature-triggered interpretation of a participant's live because
statement; the paper supplies a comparison, not an observation about
costly labor.
The original project maintenance offer at H61.8675 and the new-venue
invitation at H83.20972222222223 are last observations under the fixed
prior, not proven endings. The aftermath statistic remains count1061:
{"mode":"aftermath","unit":"items","n":1,"denominator":{"unit":"items","n":8,"of":"distinct
coded items strictly after H73 through H97"},"receipt":1061}. No item
falls at H73. Its denominator items are 63ahf5,
dfrzwby, dfs09l8, dfssjhw,
dfsu0pz, dfsuejb, dfsyng9,
dft2frg. This coded-record composition does not establish
community-wide prevalence or new-venue uptake. The reported remnant is
textual kept, qualified by loss, not verified survival.
No switch in evidence kind was made at R5. Both supplied papers were verified there; C3's contradicting-shelf and resembling/distant-field legs were unavailable and did not run. The live-attention qualification remains words-based. No novel concept or universal four-problem solution is asserted. No claim was strengthened to make the final check pass.
Open tests
Outside this record, test N01 where helpers explicitly
acknowledge scarcity but leave ambition unqualified; N02
where eligible requests lack usable answers; N03 against
the contacted actors' dated conduct; and N04 against actual
original-placement availability beyond a fixed cutoff. These are
falsifiers to investigate, not checks already passed. The largest
remaining threat is mistaking stated feasibility and later personal
repair for a verified collective maintenance mechanism. The figure must
keep its relations separate.