R6 notes

Target length: under 2,500 words, excluding the check record.

Opening and criterion

R5 passed; the manifest records no successor for model.md, structure.md or concept.md. The selected R4 pass is 2, with the accepted critic preserved. Current references were restored and the head reconciled to R6 at 6861.

Before account pass 1: prefer a later account only if it makes the existing local relation and its limits easier to follow, covers the stated episode residues more accurately, or corrects an unsupported implication without adding an unearned mechanism. Do not prefer a later version merely because it is later. An empirical change would reopen its dependent model obligations; a prose repair does not fabricate another scientific pass.

The account will be written before any render. It must state all six higher themes and the two arguable dimensions, with relational regard outside dimensions; describe the ranges of all retained elements; give each arrow's mechanism, rival, falsifier and scope; keep recognition, maintenance relief and survival outside causal arrows; and retain the three specific story residues.

Reading key and limits

CROSSWALK.md explicitly says the case aggregator has no C5 readers. No readers or fleet are dispatched, no returns or fidelity scores are invented, and the accepted R4 critic is not repeated. The global three-reader dispatch steps do not run here. The sibling's six-column table keeps the original coded label and the optional name separately. There is no third-order tier, field stage, cross-room onset comparison, global frame count or cross-case return in this run. The account uses the local episode register in both directions.

Requested configuration remains GPT-6.1 Sol medium. The gateway supplies no independent exact runtime effort/model observation. The installed transition is preserved rather than repeated. All research reads and writes remain in the gateway; controller rendering is the only drawing. No canvas or atlas is inspected.

Table selection rule

Choose rows by variation of practice and by gate edges, not frequency or support for a favoured outcome. Cover each closed coder theme, show more than one act where a higher theme needs contrast, and retain the contextual or unresolved themes below the main table with a checked quote. A row's exemplar must pass its higher gate on its own words. For a contextual source the status replaces a fabricated higher membership. Metadata identifies placehearts, exact author, instrument hour, code, item and thread. An unexplained URL remains text; it does not authorize viewing its image.

Planned close

Write the account, proposition register, prose tests, working layout comparisons and final data table before rendering. Inspect the source-bound rendered image through the native image viewer, then record any correction at its source and rerender if needed. Claims and interview follow that inspection. Finish all substantive output files before the structured confidence move; confidence.jsonl is the last research file. The controller owns generated views, sealing, deterministic export and archive verification. No claim of final archive completion precedes its reported result.

Account and figure results

Account pass 1 was written at receipt 7310, with propositions at 7315, before rendering. The selected story supplies its draft; the account makes the higher structure explicit without adding dynamic relations. Pass 2 reread the complete account, proposition register, corrected data table, claims, interview and figure record. It retained all claims and cuts under the pre-draft criterion. Account_passes.jsonl records the two passes, with its timestamp explicitly identified as recording time rather than a fabricated earlier event time.

No element was cut. Removing unlinked routing, design, interpretation or recognition boxes would make the picture simpler but hide the supported range and imply the two arrows explain everything. Keeping the conditions prevents assent from becoming command or capacity. No tier changed, and no standing finding needed a superseding revision. R4's two corrected errors and answered partition disagreement remain accepted and are not redispatched.

The three layouts compare time, explanatory role and contrasting trajectories. The final source-bound figure is a partial role display: no full mediation chain, no loop, no survival outcome, no cross-dimension arrow. Native image inspection confirmed every element and only the proposition-tagged relations with correct endpoints. The original closure at hour 73 appears in the unavailable-access range. Equal line weight is not an evidential-strength scale; the caption states that A01 is fair and A02 thin.

Initial render: bea060006e573e3708711fcbff220553cae2587dc03a62ee3a8584109479ae96. The table then received only a citation-metadata correction: the shortened c0368 and c0378 quotes now point to their exact short-span receipts 7303 and 7305. Corrected render: 915a687d4572835d5516229928fa5cb2e15b68fccd284198cbc67d4563dc920f. The image was inspected again and the table source reread through the gateway. No scientific source changed between renders.

Claims, scope and method

The final claims table separates local words and their linked replies from the fixed aftermath pattern and from the verified literature comparison. Each proposition has its mechanism, evidence, strongest rival, outside-case falsifier and model-term boundary. N02 remains thin because its independent eligible negative check is missing. No count estimates a propensity for assent or migration.

The structure still leaves relational regard without a dimension. Explicit unpicked material retains identity critique, a memory task, jokes, an unexplained URL and opposed final-pixel goals. The story residues remain workload relief in E-17, memory collection in E-14 and antagonistic goals in E-20. The native image is a model display, never empirical artwork.

A requested new aftermath count was refused because the gateway reserves that mode to R2 or FA. Preserve receipt 1388 and its distinct-item denominator rather than invent a current-stage result. Its 13/46 share is confined to coded items strictly after 73 through 97. The final last observation is c0417 at hour 83.76777777777778; it cannot date the end of all organizing. Participants' kept/lost reports are not independent visual outcomes or evidence of survival caused by an arrow.

Method licences exercised are the earlier front-end coding distinctions, Langley's narrative, temporal brackets and visual mapping, and a tier size set by practice kinds. No other room, global model, in-sample cross-case return or held-out test was used. The coding is closed and the source hashes remain protected by the gateway. The broader theoretical sampling and informant relationship are unavailable. No C5 readers run under the explicit sibling crosswalk.

The least secure account sentence is N02's conditional-resumption generalization: a reader might read it as a general law despite its stated thinness. The account ties it to continued willingness, an explicitly identified access barrier and the missing independent test. I retain it as a bounded local dependency rather than delete the observed condition or inflate it.

Complete review before confidence

All required R6 files are written. The account preceded drawing; data rows preserve original concepts and coder labels; exact quotations and metadata come through cite. The table includes the full placed tier and the required unpicked discussion, and the source-bound figure has been inspected. Claims, proposition limits, interview and handback have been read or checked against the retained registers. Interview is under 800 words. No new element or unsupported relation was introduced.

Confidence will grade the room, model, every higher theme, dimension, element and arrow before any global exposure. It is belief, never an evidence warrant. The weakest grades belong to evaluative reframing as a higher grouping and to the access arrow's independent support. The model remains partial even if the mechanical check passes.

Under the profile, confidence.jsonl must be the last research file. Accordingly no prose file will be rewritten to paste a later close report after that move. The gateway retains the close result and its relevant input hashes in the controller journal; the current head and any technical-result diary entry can point to that protected record. This resolves the global card's paste-report instruction through the sibling's stricter final-file rule without inventing a passing report in advance. The controller, not the lead, seals, exports and verifies the final archive. Technical completion is reported only after its returned result.

Close-check presentation repair

The initial close report passed structural/profile checks but failed account presentation. The table's higher-tier header used Higher theme instead of the checker-recognized Fourth-order theme; quote metadata was in keyed Markdown footnotes that the checker did not follow. The same exact metadata now appears in each quote row. The table-specific full-code quote check rejected the authorized shorter c0368 span; a full single-line, already coded exemplar from the same symbol dispute, c0365, now carries t15's evaluative judgment. Its exact quote and label were checked at 7644 and 7646. The account still retains the contrary religious interpretation; no scientific judgment changes. Claims now says carried_by: words explicitly for N01 rather than relying on capitalized Words. This repairs machine-readable presentation, not the evidence kind.

Structured reopen-finalization 7642 preserved the prior confidence hash. All model, tier, findings, critic and scientific confidence judgments remain unchanged. After rereading the repaired source, rerender and inspect, then record the same grades last against the corrected file set. The initial failed report is retained in the controller journal; no seal or archive success was claimed.