r/place A fruit fly for organization science

out/_head.md

Saved at B1.B1b-32: getting lost. This reading copy substitutes participant identifiers in saved text; it is not a new interview response. Reading Markdown.

Participant handles in these reading copies use the pixel stream's identifiers: base64(SHA1(username)), case preserved, without a salt. These are linkable pseudonyms. Profile links are removed; missing-author markers remain. Original research files are unchanged. Quote offsets refer to original text. Source and reading-copy hashes are listed separately.

Source commit: f4c2c6b8496e, 2026-10-11T08:46:16+02:00. Saved-state date: 2026-10-11T06:46:05Z. Catalogue close receipt Commit date and saved-state date are distinct.

Historical stage instructions differ from the current canonical card. Decision row 75, 11 October, was delivered for B2 after B1e closed. Saved-card SHA-256: 246c890d13c93007d92a27d29c76be7814281d946bc014c23dc96496e0819f97. Current canonical SHA-256: a2b733dded3046ba611c65e979beb597ef8ef26e8b625dea28469a254219f8a0. Instruction history.

Original GitHub file. Original SHA-256: 13dedf11156854db202d041412d96332ddea604ca81e4e4b0e9081984140cff5. Reading-copy SHA-256: 848eb0f1cf9868b1c6088af55506cf788e5ec8f062df7b66546900c956d7fb69.

Head, claude-v43-1

Under 3,000 words, rewritten whole at every close. Last written at the close of B1b-32, 2026-10-11 (UTC): the list's last six rooms read, italy to rit. Every room is read; B1b is done.

The method question, in one sentence

Can independently reconstructed case histories be composed into a shared dynamic account that supports explanations at successive levels of specificity, from population-wide patterns, through forms and subforms, to particular organizational histories, while keeping access to the evidence from which those explanations were developed?

The theory question is unchanged: when strangers organize on a clock they did not set, with no way to compel anyone and no goal given to them, what forms does organizing take, how do they differ in their functioning, and which of them keep the work alive?

Where the run stands

Stage A1 is closed; all 705 rooms have a note. Stage B1, the third-order scheme, is open.

B1a is closed. prior.md came first (sections 1 to 6 dated 2026-10-07; 7 and 8 wait for the return stage) and is sealed; a change is a departure (rule 10). Seed cd472a6087a223d4 in out/seed.txt; saturation.py order --stage B1 prints the order.

B1b is done: B1b-01 to B1b-32 are closed. Orders 1 to 574, the 86 draw rooms, and 45 rooms of the list after marker 3: 705 rooms. The last new kind is T3-197 heeding the creator's wishes (parahumans t08, B1b-30-p2). B1b-32 read 6 rooms and 66 second-order themes: 65 placed, 1 listed as unplaced, no new kind.

Markers. Marker 1 at austria (order 499, 507.0 average rooms, 71.9% of the words); its empty run, 78 rooms and 72.1 average rooms, is the second pass's target. Marker 2 at theblackvoid (order 574). Marker 3 at TheFarLeftSide, the draw read (86 rooms, no new kind).

The PI's decision at marker 3 was finish. The handler logged it at J's word (10 October 2026); the guard refuses my writing it or naming its command. It is now carried out: every room was read in the order mem.py next --stage B1 gave, with the same care, and the walk reached the list's end.

Now: 705 of 705 rooms read, 100.0% of the words, kinds 202, coverage 0.9985, unseen 20.03, 20 rounds, markers 1, 2 and 3. Next is B1c, the saturation test.

The PI's review of the oversized kinds (B1b-19-p2, B1b-20): T3-010 split into T3-010, T3-194 and T3-195; T3-009, T3-014 and T3-001 kept whole (tier_history lines 65 to 74).

J's words for B1 (7 October 2026): "national elements are very important here"; "we need to get as much variance on organizing behavior early on so that later we have enough to create the model". National, political and conflict content is study material: a theme about flags, borders, alliances or fights between national rooms is minted, placed and named as plainly as any other. The handler's rule: a choice to leave out or soften content for any reason other than the study's goes to J first with mem.py ask, and the content stays meanwhile. Nothing was left out or softened at B1b-32.

The PI's clarifications (8 October, approved by J): the thresholds are the design's heuristic; the rule is unchanged.

How to work, from J (8 October, 23:45 Berlin, "can you do a hot change for the batching?"; relayed by the handler at 22:03Z; carry this paragraph into every head). A change in how I work, not in what I read or decide. Fewer turns. When two or more tool calls do not depend on each other's output, make them in one turn. Chain ordered commands in one Bash call with &&, so that a failure stops the rest; for example, the mem.py log or note just decided, then the next mem.py codes. Never put a write in the same turn as the read it depends on. Never run two writes to the same file as separate parallel calls. Keep one room's material per read, as now. Every tool still writes its own record; nothing about what I read or decide changes.

Two rules from J at B1b-29 (through the handler, 20:10Z; carry them into every head). Write rule 0 lines and bags with b1_multiplace_write4.py and b1_bags_from_file2.py, not the old scripts, which made one mem.py call per row of the whole table and grew to 8.5 minutes a write. Never end a turn while a job runs in the background; run every write and check in the foreground.

No question is open.

How the B1 walk went, and what carries into B1c and B1d (the stage file, kept here for after a compaction)

Stage A1, what B1 inherits

Contrary rooms

Blocks 01 to 19, with the contrast's sides in contrast.md; among them morrowind, egypt, FloydVsVoid, UNLincoln, placestart, Summit1G, ainbowroad, dota2. The room that fits nothing else, chosen at A1c: Summit1G. B1d reads the contrary rooms with the rooms the saturation test finds not fitting.

Open distinctions, carried into B1c and B1d

None is filed in _questions/. Still open: who started the work; wars told twice; rivals who turn partners (E1076, E1122, E1142, E1318); protection bought from a bigger faction (T3-099) and protection given, with no host-side kind (E894 to E899, E969, E1199, E1209 to E1214, E1238, E1247, E1331); whose flag a shared flag is (E1118); one act read differently by its rooms (E722, E725, E847, E887, E952, E1132, E1201), and records that disagree on who attacked, whether a promise held, whether a truce existed, who invaded, whether a bot ran, who overwrote whom or why a design changed (E1190 to E1272, E1296, E1300, E1305, E1324, E1332, E1334, E1340); who drove a bot and why it left a work (E1025); a room's builders disowning its own expansion (E1025); a room's own scripts barring it from sparing a neighbour (E843) or wrecking a protectorate it then rebuilt (E1209); one member on both sides of a quarrel (E820, E947); objections to altering the final image, split between T3-054 and T3-105; striking where the defence is weak (theblackvoid t08, in T3-020); offensive joking as a kind of its own (ultrahardcore t07, in T3-031); veiled fascist emblems and number codes (croatia c0007 and c0008, bagged under T3-113; BVB 88 and BVB NS, in T3-146); political slogans as such, with no kind (TheFarLeftSide t02, in T3-033).

Ledgers at this close

The next comparison

The next leg is B1c, the saturation test. It opens with the startup packet; mem.py next --stage B1 reports the walk's end. Write the sample's seed and rule into notes-B1.md before drawing it, then read the sample fresh against the gates and count what does not fit. Then B1d, the second pass, with marker 1's empty run as its target.

The scheme as it stands

197 third-order themes, the working grouping in scheme/scheme_current.jsonl (mem.py scheme --brief). Size distribution: 12 themes hold one second-order theme, 10 two, 9 three, 6 four, 7 five, 3 six, 3 seven, 8 eight; 14 are seen in one room only. The largest: T3-009 (532, 6.8%), T3-010 (444), T3-005 (429), T3-031 (390), T3-002 (385), T3-001 (381), T3-021 (357), T3-004 (347); none holds one in ten. Names to change at B1e: T3-010 should say borders and space; T3-056 should drop "kindred"; T3-121 should say sanctioning by exclusion; T3-023 should say the sub's takeover, not only its moderators; T3-048 should say a company's or organisation's own; T3-030 should drop "after the close"; T3-192 should say griefing the room's own work; T3-065 should say a nation's or a state's flag. Gates to sharpen: T3-197 (members follow the stated wishes of the person the work honours; not merely hoping for notice), T3-196 (buyers, newcomers, a sub woken), T3-195 (held to the deal: partner or self), T3-160 (memorials to the dead, such as the 96 of Hillsborough; a lost artwork's go to T3-029), T3-080 (a flag's own design and slogans; political symbols as targets), T3-081 (regional and named battles), T3-085 (attacking flags as such, national or pride), T3-146 (number codes such as 88 and NS count as hate symbols; whether obscene images count), T3-177 (Nazi slogans and calls as well as swastikas; veiled fascist emblems, or T3-080), T3-193 (cooperation with a rival fandom), T3-063 (joke removals), T3-099 or a new host-side kind (protection given). National kinds minted under J's words: T3-065, T3-078, T3-079, T3-080, T3-081, T3-085, T3-099, T3-113, T3-130, T3-145, T3-165, T3-166 and T3-180; their names are in scheme --brief.