Source-bound figure and inspection

The controller rendered model/elements.jsonl, model/arrows.jsonl and propositions.jsonl after the account and table were written. Render version: ace42768204b7a42a696a316ca2bf2e9e9c2e11ceb50dde4b1fae5049e5e09c3. Image: out/display/ace42768204b7a42a696a316ca2bf2e9e9c2e11ceb50dde4b1fae5049e5e09c3/model.png. Inspected with the native image tool; table source read at 7960.

The four arrows describe bounded local responses, not estimated causal effects. The uniform line for A04 does not encode its thin warrant: it is the thin acceptance-to-release sequence, not equally strong evidence with the other relations. Two-column paths are local orders; the Grey Blob path has the intermediate accepting process P04, not a universal mediator. Disconnected boxes are retained observations/conditions, not silent causes. No complete loop is drawn.

Every box

• P01: Specifying a drawable next task. Range: A proposed object and its ordinary local response, not every choice, order or completed mark.
• P02: Undertaking a named local task or reporting a beginning. Range: Acknowledged work or reported start; no inference of durable completion.
• P03: Offering room for artwork under reciprocal defense terms. Range: Explicit conditional neighbor offers, not every restraint appeal.
• P04: Accepting reciprocal defense work to keep an artwork. Range: Tentative willingness or explicit reciprocal promise, not completed performance.
• P05: Requesting revised tools or wider notice after overwritten work. Range: Correction and publicity requests grounded in participants' reports, without certifying their diagnosis.
• P06: Releasing an unfinished agreement after placement closes. Range: Explicit release in the read full Grey Blob turn; coded quote alone preserves lament.
• P07: Marking and preserving a shared achievement. Range: Thanks, song and preserved accounts, not verified artwork survival or goal unanimity.
• P08: Routing helpers to current instructions and specialist channels. Range: Directions to coordination; observed entry or use is not required or inferred.
• K01: New pixel work is reported repeatedly overwritten. Range: A reported practical obstacle, not a settled identity of erasers.
• K02: Participants want incompatible ends for shared activity. Range: Explicit or enacted opposed desired outcomes, not a collective reversal or all-purpose disagreement.
• K03: Further placement on the original platform is unavailable. Range: External closure at hour 73, with uneven awareness; does not end every social or coordinating act.
• K04: A needed update or venue is not immediately accessible. Range: Absent updater, practical venue constraint or principled objection; these grounds remain distinct.

Every drawn arrow and its instance

• A01 / N01: P01 to P02. Label proposal c0189 gives a responsive helper an object, followed by reported beginning c0191, E-10. Live refusal elsewhere defeats universality.
• A02 / N02: P03 to P04. Grey Blob terms c0193 are explicitly accepted in c0194, E-08. Commitment only, no measured inducement effect.
• A03 / N03: K01 to P05. Obstruction report c0160 followed by retry c0161, tool-change c0162 and publicity c0163, E-07. Means reopened, diagnosis and remedy unresolved.
• A04 / N04: P04 to P06. Accepted bargain c0194, contact promise c0195, release in full final turn dfsacgn, 637idk, E-08, as read at 3549 and 6797. c0196 alone is lament; the account states that limit. Thin, no external failure opportunity established.

Quoted instances are supplied byte-for-byte in account.md and data_structure.md through cites 7610–7684; the complete support arrays remain the source, not these paraphrases. Every drawn arrow has quote support; no forest-transition array is claimed (support_transition is empty throughout). This is one case; no arrow has a community prevalence count. The retained episode support and adverse tests are in arrows.jsonl, not a frequency inferred from how many lines appear.

K03 explicitly marks external closure at hour 73. No edge is invented from closure to every process. A05 has no instance and no proposition, so is omitted. The views with and without admissible theorised arrows therefore coincide: none qualifies for drawing; a dashed invented route would be misleading.

What is absent

The model deliberately leaves P08 unjoined to uptake, P07 unjoined to later motivation, and conditions K02 and K04 without identified effects. There are no formal-role boxes or dimension-to-dimension arrows. t18, t19, t20, t21 are contextual rather than higher-theme members, although the deadline condition uses t19. Allocation-review authority, post-close uptake, origins and global agreed purpose are unaccounted for. Successful task acceptance crosses the closed topic-based theme tier through FP-01; it is not counted as another theme.

The image was legible and faithful to these source decisions. No source correction or new analytical pass is warranted by the drawing. It remains a sparse local process model, not a complete organizational theory.

Header-only close repair

Initial close check failed table:tiers, not model or evidence. The table header now explicitly names the sibling T4 column in the prescribed six-column order. Current table source was read at8178; no row or quote changed. Re-rendered graph has the same scientific elements and arrows and was inspected natively. The previous render version 105c87276669abf820c171c9c88ab5e80ba5f37f09702c94433a0d46a7565125 is retained historically. Original confidence grades are repeated unchanged after reopening finalization8146.