Figure: local transitions and their limits

Source-bound dynamic model

Required clock caption

Original-canvas placement stops at imposed hour 73. Live work is at or before 73; aftermath is strictly after 73 through 97. The graph image itself does not print this clock. This caption is part of the figure and must accompany it: P01 after closure means attempted entry in a replacement venue, while P07 can preserve a reported result without continuing original placing. There is no closure-to-migration causal arrow. The image alone is an incomplete presentation without this clock and the strength limits below.

Source and visual inspection

The controller rendered version 215125c3491faafb0aa3792ad97621a7c499be149cad1a0ccf6e895820f72ce4 from the model files, propositions and data structure. I inspected its native image and the served HTML table source (receipt 6520), then checked the table's Markdown source at 6508. The image has readable labels, the correct endpoints and A01/N01 and A02/N02 tags. The table preserves the original coder labels, material left column and blank optional names; its source section retains attribution and residue.

The layout places unlinked elements in a left stack. Their vertical position is not a sequence or hierarchy. K01 is a scope condition, not a cause linked to every process. The visual renderer does not display arrow strength; both arrows are fair and bounded, with unaddressed negative testing. Read those qualifications here. The model has no separate mediator between either pair of endpoints, so this is a two-transition process display, not a complete mediated causal system.

Exact box and arrow specification

Retain P01 offering an entry route, object or usable plan; P02 specifying complementary repair actions and a shared time; P03 acknowledging a joint or recognizable completion; P04 calling contributors to account for departures; P05 revisiting attribution or sanction after an answer; P06 pressing or negotiating reach into neighbouring work; P07 interpreting and preserving a reported result; P08 calling for restoration or guarding; and K01 limiting what a speaker's undertaking establishes about other placers.

Draw A01 from P02 to P03, tagged N01. Its instance is E-02: the agreed pixel repair in c0027, item dfoskt3, and acknowledgment in c0071, item dfosqu9, thread 62rwzd. The quoted timing instruction and "Yes, gelukt! High-Five!" are in account.md and arrows.jsonl. The endpoint hours are 18.953333333333333 and 19.10388888888889. There is no asserted measured interval.

Draw A02 from P04 to P05, tagged N02. Its clearest instance is E-04: accusation c0077, denial c0078 in dfowkrg, and apology c0079 in dfowq9p, thread 62sk70. The denial and apology at hours 21.656111111111112 and 21.735833333333332 supply the competing account and revision, quoted in account.md and arrows.jsonl. E-03 adds qualified sanction release, not confirmed innocence.

Both instances are in this one room. Episode registers identify scope; no community-prevalence count or arrow base rate is asserted. Each arrow is grounded by cited words and full context, not a support_transition interval. No loop is drawn because loops.jsonl records no full dated cycle.

With and without theorised arrows

Both versions are identical. There is no registered theorised arrow to add. Conjectures about plans producing compliance, bargaining enforcing restraint and preservation causing recruitment remain ungrounded prose; they are not silently drawn as a second model. Every retained arrow has a proposition, and no arrow is omitted for lack of one.

The figure leaves out contextual t01 and the anthem residue in E-18. Its P07 retains result work outside D01; it does not turn all public evaluation into an incentive system. The middle of the fuller story includes local commitment and contested attribution, not a causal arrow between the four thematic boxes. The caption and account retain that difference.

The account's metadata-only addition changed the rendered source version. The current figure was inspected again; the image and table content are unchanged. The first rendered version remains preserved. No scientific correction or model change occurred.

Table presentation repair

The first close check required explicit tier wording and attribution within each table row. data_structure.md now names the fourth-order (T4) column and places community, author, source hour and code in every row. Its t08 exemplar is the complete closed-code assurance in c0080, replacing a valid but table-incompatible subspan of c0308. No label, membership, model relation or judgment changed. The current native figure was fully visible and inspected again; the endpoints and tags are correct. Its model image hash is unchanged. The revised complete table source was read at 6918.

The next presentation check accepted the tier order and full-code quotation but still required attribution directly in the quote cell. The verified metadata is now repeated there as well as in the concept cell. No source words, labels, claims or grades change. Current table source was read completely at 7030; the drawing's model image hash remains unchanged. The earlier full native inspections and current manifest 7026 establish the same figure despite intermittent repeat-image delivery.